> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.firelight.finance/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.firelight.finance/risk-consortium/becoming-a-member.md).

# Becoming a Member

The Risk Consortium is made up of independent technical experts. The MVP launches with five confirmed members (Hypernative, Cyfrin, Credora, GFX Labs, and Native). This page covers who the consortium looks for and the terms of participation. It does not publish compensation specifics.

### Who the consortium looks for

The consortium draws from organizations with deep technical expertise in DeFi security and risk. Typical backgrounds include:

| Background                              | What they bring                                                                  |
| --------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| DeFi risk managers                      | Protocol-level risk analysis, parameter setting, credit and liquidity assessment |
| Security auditors                       | Smart contract review, exploit pattern recognition, remediation experience       |
| On-chain forensics specialists          | Transaction tracing, attacker identification, evidence assembly                  |
| Monitoring and infrastructure providers | Real-time detection, oracle and bridge expertise                                 |

No single member needs to cover all of these. The consortium is designed to aggregate complementary expertise across its members.

### Independence requirement

Independence is the gating criterion. Candidates must operate at arm's length from Firelight's commercial teams and from the protocols they assess. That includes no direct employment relationship with Firelight entities, disclosure of advisory roles or investments in covered protocols, and a commitment to declare conflicts and abstain when they arise. Candidates whose independence cannot be maintained are not eligible, regardless of technical strength.

### Selection process

The Network engages members through a structured process: introduction or nomination, a capability review against the expertise the consortium wants to cover, an independence check, and a participation agreement on approval. The consortium starts at its confirmed size of five and may expand as coverage volume and protocol complexity grow.

### Terms of participation

A participation agreement covers scope of duties, the mandatory voting responsibilities and optional activities described in [Role of the Consortium](/risk-consortium/role-of-the-consortium.md), response-time commitments, the conflicts policy, confidentiality around non-public exploit information, term and termination, and the basis for compensation.

### What the consortium expects

Effective participation requires availability (incidents arrive on the protocol's schedule, not the member's), technical rigor (members are the last line of defense before payout), discretion (exploit information can be time-sensitive), and professional conduct (votes and rationales are on the record).

### Exiting the consortium

Members can leave by giving notice under their participation agreement. The Network can also remove members who repeatedly miss response windows, develop unresolvable conflicts, or breach the confidentiality or conflicts policies.

### Where to read next

* [Role of the Consortium](/risk-consortium/role-of-the-consortium.md) for the detailed scope of the role.
* [How Claims Are Assessed](/risk-consortium/how-claims-are-assessed.md) for the procedure members follow on each incident.


---

# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.

## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.

Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:

```
GET https://docs.firelight.finance/risk-consortium/becoming-a-member.md?ask=<question>&goal=<endgoal>
```

`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.

The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.

Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.
